What can you say about a cursory glance at the most recent USPS Revenues Pieces and Weights report other than “CURSES!!” ?
What else can one say? They raised their rates around 2.5% last January, and six months later, revenues, pieces and weights are down.
SPOILER ALERT: This is all about numbers, which mean little, unless you are thinking about money.
You can see the details for yourself, but a cautionary word: the official RPW report above covers 9 months, from October 1 to June 30. I have extracted the numbers below to cover from January to June, 2019.
In First Class Mail, which is all about bills, statements, cards and letters to mom and the folks, volume was off 3.2%– 904,000,000 pieces less than 2018.
Marketing Mail– direct mail was off 4.9%, — down 1,839,000,000 pieces from a year ago. Even more disturbing, the weight of those direct mail pieces also shrank about 2% from 1.49 ounces in 2018 to 1.46 ounces in 2019.
The lesson here is that when you raise prices, despite your dominant position in the marketplace, people will buy less. We experienced a similar phenomenon at our favorite bakery when they raised the price of a cinnamon bun from $2.00 to $3.50. We used to buy 4, for $8. Now we buy one. Who’s happy?
The only bright light in the USPS tunnel to perdition is the package volume. Thanks to Internet orders, parcel shipments are still growing revenues, up 3.6%, though pieces and weights are off 1.7% and 3.3% respectively.
For wholly different reasons, magazine volume is also continuing its slide. Pieces are off 7.7% to 2,345,000,000 total delivered to as many as 159 million addresses in each of the past 6 months. If these magazines are all monthlies, there are approximately 391 million subscriptions in effect. About 2.4 for every household in America. While that may seem like plenty, just 5 years ago, the USPS delivered just over 3 billion periodicals, honoring approximately 502 million contracts, or 3.2 for every household. But face it: if it wasn’t for the waiting rooms outside doctors’ offices, lube shops and office lobbies, the count would be less.
None of these figures should surprise you. We all know the effect of the Internet on hard copy, paper, ink, and postal delivery. Still, it is distressing to see a vital communications channel slowly price itself into a retreat, fulfilling a prophecy of irrelevance.
But it’s not irrelevant. Total mail volume in the fiscal year 2018 was 146 billion pieces. That weighed 12.3 million tons. For those of you who are counting, that’s 108 USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carriers, soaking wet.
I have said it several times before, that the USPS, as an independent government agency has lots to be proud of, starting with its relatively minuscule cost to the US taxpayer. Its 2017-2018 annual report showed an operating loss of $3.9 billion. Sounds like a lot! It’s 0.095% of the total U.S budget. Less than one tenth of a percent.
The reality is, the USPS is still the bargain of all the media choices: it’s part of our lives, 6 days a week, with door-to-door pick-up and delivery, costing the taxpayer household about $23 per year, plus stamps. Beat that, Amazon Prime.
4 thoughts on “USPS: A Six-Month Stagger Into 2019”
I believe their pensions are fairly well-funded.
Sad to say, when I’m sitting in a medical office, I’m on my smartphone, as are all the others in seats. The children on the floor love to rip up the magazines from the table. Is that what fate awaits print media going forward?
Hi Peter! Yes I think you have pretty much captured the essence of it. We will always have print around but more as a boutique product than mass merchandise. Unfortunately the economics of print media are based on volume, and as that decreases, unit costs rise exponentially. Hopefully we will not see a drop in demand for bathroom tissue. Thanks for writing!
Hi Phil. You made a comment on one of my blog posts a couple days ago, which I followed up on with my own comment, then realized your comment was directed at someone else, not me. So I’ve since deleted my comment! (I didn’t feel it was polite to jump in without the other fellow responding first.) Anyway, my apologies.